Featured image of post Which Side Places More Importance on the Other’s “First Time”

Which Side Places More Importance on the Other’s “First Time”

In the dating and marriage market, do girls care more about a guy being a virgin, or do guys care more about a girl being a virgin?

This title may be subject to misunderstanding.

Let’s explain in detail: in the dating and marriage market, do girls care more about a guy being a virgin, or do guys care more about a girl being a virgin?

First, there’s a prerequisite for discussing this—aiming for marriage. Because when simply dating, many people don’t care about virginity, and some may even think that playing the field is easier and the technical experience is not good.

It’s only when aiming to spend a lifetime together in marriage that it involves the true comprehensive marriage “market”.

Now, let’s start proving who cares more about this.

Actions speak louder than words. How people behave is more important than what they say.

We won’t discuss what people say, as the internet is full of “won’t date non-virgins” talk, from both men and women.

In the current context, what matters is which side is willing to give up more benefits to find a virgin.

Let’s first talk about the differences in underlying logic.

One major factor affecting dating choices for men and women is dating experience. And a major factor affecting dating experience is the other person’s experience.

Currently, most dating relationships are still mainly led by men, with women being more passive. This results in a good dating experience placing high demands on a man’s dating skills and experience.

If a guy is highly skilled and leads well, both sides will be comfortable in the relationship.

But skills and experience are developed over time.

The “inexperienced virgin” and the “excellent dating leader” are fundamentally conflicting.

So, due to seeking experiences, women are more likely to give up the “virgin” requirement and choose the “leader” condition.

As women are more passive, experience and skills are definitely useful. But compared to other factors, they are not as important. Most people just wait for the other person to take the lead.

When it comes to dating experience, for women, a man’s dating experience is important, while for men, a woman’s dating experience is not as important.

This difference directly leads to a result. Many women feel that training a guy and teaching him to date is very tiring, and there’s a risk of previous experience benefiting future partners.

So, they’d rather take it easy and are willing to find someone with good dating skills, even in bed.

But for guys, it’s basically the opposite.

Usually, men take the lead in dating, and unless it’s a woman who really understands men, there’s not much difference between having experience and not having experience.

Many men are happy to lead and train inexperienced girls, so why bother finding someone with more experience?

Guys like to find girls with good dating skills when dating.

But it seems that very few men are willing to find someone with experience when getting married.

Just think, when a guy and his wife are about to have sex for the first time, and the girl is skilled in every way, do you think the guy would be happy or upset?

Now, let’s talk about the differences in giving up benefits.

In the dating and marriage market, guys are genuinely willing to give up economic benefits for the “virgin” requirement. In fact, many guys can lower their requirements for a girl’s looks for the “virgin” requirement.

You should know that appearance is very important in a man’s mate selection requirements.

Guys won’t hesitate to choose the latter as their wife.

I’ve also encountered many interesting cases.

One guy in particular.

He’s above average in overall conditions and comes from a very well-off family.

They own three houses in the city, with idle funds in the bank totaling in the millions.

Then he made an interesting request for choosing a partner.

“A non-virgin and a house don’t go together.”

What he means is, other requirements are normal.

If the other person is a virgin, he’ll give a fully paid house in the city and put it in her name, along with a car worth 500,000, and a double dowry based on the other party’s customs, with no need to take it back to her family.

If the other person is not a virgin, no house in her name, the car should still be there, and no dowry will be given, and a full check must be done before marriage.

This almost humiliating request reflects his obsession with this issue.

But it shouldn’t be a big problem, after all, with his conditions, it’s not impossible to choose a princess.

But it seems that for the pursuit of a “virgin,” very few women are willing to give up core benefits such as “looks,” “economy,” and “height.”

Have you heard of women choosing an average guy over a handsome young man just to find a virgin?

Have you heard of women choosing a working-class family over a well-off family just to find a virgin?

Have you heard of women lowering their height requirements by 5–8 centimeters just to find a virgin?

Have you heard of women giving up their so-called “feelings” just to find a virgin?

Have you heard more about the “virgin complex” or the “virgin complex”?

Even in some women’s understanding, they believe that the more emotionally experienced a guy is, the stronger and more attractive he is.

But in a man’s understanding, a woman with a rich emotional history is very likely to get a mark, except for the one who accepts it.

So, only those willing to give up core values for the exchange are truly important.

Overall, men are more willing to cut down to the bone in this aspect.